Browse

Latest Headlines

Fresh headlines, crisp visuals — faster reading.

Khloé Kardashian’s Four-Year Celibacy Milestone Prompts Doctor to Debunk Myths New

Khloé Kardashian’s Four-Year Celibacy Milestone Prompts Doctor to Debunk Myths

Published 13:45 6 Oct 2026 GMT+1Khloé spoke out on her celibacy journey during a teaser clip for the upcoming season of The KardashiansA women’s health doctor has explained exactly what happens when you abstain from sex for a long time, after Khloé Kardashian opened up on reaching four years of celibacy.The 42-year-old reality TV star, who has been open about her abstinence journey, commented on the milestone in the trailer for the upcoming season of The Kardashians.In a teaser clip of the show, which is due to premiere on 8 October on Hulu, she announced: “I’m single, I might be ready to mingle.”She then admitted that last December, when the show was filmed, she had abstained from sex from four years, to which her sister Kendall joked: “Never say never, right!”AdvertKhloé was last romantically linked with Tristan Thompson, with whom she shares her two children, True, eight, and Tatum, four, and hasn’t been shy about her decision to keep romance out of the bedroom since.It comes at a time when celibacy is growing in popularity and visibility, with other big-name celebrities such as Sharon Stone speaking out about their experiences.Last December, Khloé marked four years of celibacy (Instagram/@khloekardashian)Tyla spoke with intimate health, menopause, hormone health, and women's wellness issues expert, Dr Shirin Lakhani, who delved into how a decision like this could affect your body and dispelled the common myths we’ve been led to believe.She explained: “The body should not undergo any particular changes simply because someone hasn't had sex for a certain amount of time. There may be some changes to your hormones, such as a reduction in oxytocin and endorphins as well as a dip in dopamine levels.“This can affect your mood and motivation, however extended celibacy does not permanently alter long-term hormone production.“For some women, celibacy can actually have a positive effect with fewer concerns around sexually transmitted infections or UTIs, pregnancy or contraception.”What are the myths around celibacy?Dr Lakhani explained that one of the biggest myths is that our vagina changes shape or ‘tightness’ depending on how much sex you have, which is completely untrue.The expert told Tyla: “Sex, or a lack of sex, does not cause permanent changes to the size or shape of the vagina or labia.“The vagina is highly elastic and returns to its usual shape after intercourse. Similarly, the length and appearance of the labia are determined by genetics and natural anatomical variation, not sexual activity.”She added: “Genetics play a significant role in determining the natural size and shape of the labia, and there is a wide range of normal variation.”Another popular myth is that your hormones become ‘messed up’ somehow when you’re not having regular sex, which Dr Lakhani says is ‘absolutely not the case and is quite damaging to make people believe that they need sex for their hormones to function correctly’.She outlined: “Sexual activity can influence things such as arousal, stress and mood, but there isn't a medically defined amount of sex that a woman needs to maintain hormonal or physical health.”It's not the first time the reality TV star has spoken out about celibacy (Hulu/The Kardashians/Instagram)Are there any other ways celibacy affects your health?For post-menopausal women who lack oestrogen, the women’s health expert explains that less sexual stimulation may cause faster thinning, drying, and loss of elasticity in vaginal walls. She told Tyla: “Pelvic floor stimulation through sex can also help to strengthen the muscles, and without it could possibly affect the strength of your pelvic floor.‘Some women experience increased UTIs, thrush or BV when sexually active, so being celibate may have a positive effect on decreased reactivity.”Shr urged: “However, I would note that being celibate is a personal decision and any changes to the body or how you feel is completely individual to each person.“Not having sex does not switch off oestrogen, progesterone or testosterone production, or cause menopause. The short-lived hormonal responses associated with sexual activity are different from your underlying reproductive hormone level.”Desire and wellbeing can vary, and while some women feel less interested in sex during a break; others do not, this isn’t the case for everyhone.Dr Lakhani concluded: “ Whether celibacy feels comfortable or distressing matters more than any prescribed frequency of sex. There is no medically “normal” amount.“Pain, persistent dryness or bleeding should be assessed rather than simply attributed to celibacy. There is no need to push through painful sex.”Featured Image Credit: Instagram/@khloekardashianTopics: Women's Health, Khloe Kardashian, The Kardashians, Sex and Relationships, Reality TV, Celebrity

Oct 06, 2026
Student iz Valjeva tvrdi da je policija pokušala da mu uzme telefon New

Student iz Valjeva tvrdi da je policija pokušala da mu uzme telefon

Foto: N1 autor: 06. okt. 2026. 20:39 Srpska napredna stranka organizovala je skup u Valjevu, gde se nosilac liste "Ujedinjena Srbija" Aleksandar Vučić obratio građanima. Takođe, okupili su se i građani koji protestuju, ispred kojih stoji kordon policije. Student Vuk Vasiljević rekao je za N1 da ga je policijski ispektor povukao za ruku i pokušao da mu oduzme telefon, kao i da su studenti koji su prethodno hteli da postave štand - legitimisani. Oglas Iako se predizborni skup Aleksandra Vučića završio, a građani koji su se okupili kako bi izrazili bunt zbog njegovog dolaska polako razilaze, još uvek su u centru grada prisutne marice, kordon policije i jedinice žandarmerije, javlja reporter N1.Okupljeni Valjevci koji protestuju pustili su pesmu "Tri poljupca hoću ja", kao odgovor na bakljadu.Kako podseća naš reporter, ovo je prvi put da je Aleksandar Vučić došao u Valjevo nakon avgusta 2025. kada su održani veliki protesti.Vuk Vasiljević, student iz Valjeva, rekao je za N1da je bilo "opsadno stanje u gradu"."Odlučili smo, kao i prethodnih dana, da postavimo štand prekoputa Gradskog trga, prišla nam je komunlana inspektorka koja nam je rekla da sklonimo štand, koji i dalje u tom trenutku nismo ni postavili, već su se pripremali na neki način haosa sa njihove strane kao što uvek i pokušavaju", naveo je.Kako je dodao, studenti su pitali da li mogu da dele promotivni materijal i da razgovaraju sa građanima bez štanda, na šta su im odgovorili da mogu, ali da je nakon nekoliko minuta usledio dolazak uniformisanih policajaca."Legitimisali su nas koji smo bili prisutni, tu su bili i građani sa nama", rekao je student i dodao da su im rekli da moraju da se pomere sto metara ispod Gradskog trga. Foto: N1 Na pitanje da li je bilo incidenata i da li je došlo do kontakta između građana i policije, Vasiljević je naveo da ga je policijski ispektor povukao za ruku i pokušao da mu oduzme telefon."Kolegu je povukao za ruku isto inspektor, valjda isto pokušavajući da mu oduzme telefon, zato što smo snimali osobe koje se nalaze tu", rekao je.Dodao je da su primetili "veliki broj maskiranih ljudi, maskiranih policajaca, ljudi sa kačektima". Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama: Koje je tvoje mišljenje o ovoj temi? Učestvuj u diskusiji ili pročitaj komentare

Oct 06, 2026
Dominic Fritz pune o condiție clară pentru guvernul Luca Niculescu New

Dominic Fritz pune o condiție clară pentru guvernul Luca Niculescu

Președintele USR, Dominic Fritz, a spus la Digi24 că partidul său nu va vota guvernul Luca Niculescu, dacă acesta va include miniștri de la PSD. În ceea ce privește un cabinet tehnocrat, el spune că există riscul ca acesta să fie „pus în geam, ca să arunce oamenii cu roșii și ouă în ei”.„Nu votăm un premier, ci votăm un guvern. Și pentru noi, întrebarea importantă este cine va lua decizii în acest guvern. Dacă vom avea un guvern în care PSD, ori pe față, ori în spatele culiselor, va lua deciziile pentru România, atunci nu este un guvern pe care îl vom putea susține”, a spus Fritz.„Așa cum arată lucrurile acum, eu vă spun sincer că nu văd ce majoritate coerentă și asumată ar putea să existe, care să livreze rezultate reale cu un astfel de guvern. Pentru că vedem, de fapt, o majoritate reală, neasumată, în Parlament. Asta este majoritatea PSD-AUR și nu poate să existe un guvern, pe de o parte, și o majoritate care decide altfel într-o altă parte.„E vorba despre cum funcționează democrația noastră. Un guvern poate, în cel mai bun caz, să dea ordonanțe de urgență, dar care apoi depind de Parlament, care poate să vină cu amendamente. Și am văzut în trecut cum anumite decizii ale guvernului să fie sabotate în Parlament sau să fie acolo votate legi care sunt opusul intenției guvernului”, a adăugat el.„Democrația funcționează cu niște principii. Și un principiu important este asumarea, transparența și responsabilitatea. Cine are puterea trebuie să fie și... să putem să-l tragem la răspundere. Cu ce echipă de miniștri va veni Luca Niculescu și pe cine vor putea românii să tragă la răspundere atunci când acest guvern nu va face reforme, nu se va lupta pentru justiție independentă, nu va scădea deficitul, ca să mai oprim din inflație? Toate aceste lucruri, încă o dată, trebuie să fie clare, pentru că altfel cetățenii la vot nu pot să tragă concluzii”, a continuat președintele USR.El a adăugat că dacă în guvernul Niculescu vor fi miniștri PSD, USR nu va vota acest cabinet. În ceea ce privește un guvern tehnocrat, Fritz a spus: „Și dacă are o majoritate în Parlament care ia alte decizii, pentru ce avem nevoie de un guvern tehnocrat, dacă de fapt Parlamentul întoarce orice fel de decizie ulterior? Cu cine va negocia acest guvern tehnocrat deciziile politice? Pentru că altfel ce vom vedea este că acest guvern tehnocrat este în geam, ca să arunce oamenii cu roșii și ouă în ei, și în rest toată lumea face opoziție în timp ce PSD și AUR își fac combinațiile în Parlament”. Editor : M.B.

Oct 06, 2026
Why Democratic Support Just Hit Its Highest Level Since 2009 New

Why Democratic Support Just Hit Its Highest Level Since 2009

More Americans are identifying as Democratic than at any time since the first years of the Obama administration, less than a month before the midterm elections.The latest quarterly poll from Gallup shows 50 percent of Americans asked either said they were a Democrat or leaned that way, compared to 39 percent for the Republican Party. The share of those on the left has been steadily rising since the end of 2024, while the number of those saying they were Republican or Republican-leaning has fallen.The result for the Democratic Party is potentially surprising, with the party having struggled to win voters over in other national polling in recent months, and it remains to be seen if this overall sentiment is transferred to results in November."The party lean category is a good indicator of vote intentions," Stephen Ansolabehere, professor of government at Harvard University, told Newsweek on Monday. "Generally, when it’s a good year for a party the proportion of people who lean in the direction of the eventual winner of the election goes up in October and November. Come January or February that category returns to its original levels."A Democratic National Committee spokesperson said in a statement to Newsweek, “All across the country, Americans are rejecting Trump and Republicans’ toxic agenda of sky high prices, rampant corruption, and endless chaos. Heading into the election, Democrats are confident, but not complacent. We are all gas, no brakes to reach every voter, expand the map, and win up and down the ballot this November.” Meanwhile, Republican National Press Secretary Natalie Baldassarre told Newsweek: “National polls always underestimate support for Republicans and liberal rags like Newsweek always take the bait. Republicans are united in exposing the far-left's extreme agenda and will leave it all on the table to defy history in November." Democratic Support Reached Obama-Era LevelParty affiliation, like politics more widely, had been ever-changing, but with the two parties still holding most of the power in U.S. Congress, where Americans fall even if they consider themselves independent matters.In the last quarter of 2024, in the wake of the presidential election that saw President Donald Trump reelected to the White House, Republicans led the Gallup polling with 47 percent compared to 43 percent identifying as Democratic. The lead did not last very long, with the parties being tied the next quarter.More Americans have been identifying as Democratic or leaning that way in the months since, leading up to the 50 percent figure seen in Monday's poll. The last time the Democratic side of the poll was as high was in 2009, during Obama's first term in the White House.The numbers do become more nuanced when including independents, who currently sit at 45 percent, but Democrats sit at 5 points higher than Republicans, at 30 percent, in the latest survey.Gallup carries out the survey every quarter, with the latest conducted among a random sample of 3,000 U.S. adults age 18 and older, living across all 50 states and Washington, D.C., with a +2 percent margin of error.While the poll is a likely morale boost for the Democratic National Committee, history can offer a warning to the party, with polls that underestimated Republicans in key states leading to surprise GOP victories.A long-running core issue is transferring those supporters into actual voters at the ballot box. Those with a favorable view of the Democratic Party still may not want to vote for a particular candidate covering their district or state, and that could mean the difference between the Democrats taking control of Congress or the GOP maintaining its grip.Why Are More Americans Identifying as Democrats?As Ansolabehere said, the shift may indicate a Democratic win next month, and part of the reason for that could be not that Americans are more supportive of Democrats, but rather increasingly unhappy with Trump and the GOP-controlled legislature.The cost of living has become a key issue for voters this year—as it was when the Democrats last saw their Gallup numbers peak in 2009 at the height of the recession. At the time, there was hope that then-President Barack Obama was working on fixing the issues his predecessor was seen as having played a part in causing, and the newly elected president was still riding a wave of popularity that led to his 2008 election win.Recent polling has shown Trump's disapproval rating on the economy has equaled President George W. Bush's handling of economy at the end of his term, despite the current president's efforts to downplay rising gas and grocery prices."I think it is yet another datapoint that the public has soured on Republicans and President Trump. It is consistent with what we have seen in other trends such as presidential approval, special election results, and primary turnout," Josh Clinton, professor who covers public opinion at Vanderbilt University, told Newsweek. "Even though views of the Democratic Party have not much improved according to many polls since 2024, the fact that people are increasingly likely to prefer Democrats over Republicans shows just how toxic the Republican brand has become to formerly independent and swing voters."The fact that it has reached a level similar to where it was in 2009 is telling given that both times were instances in which the public seemingly blamed Republicans for failing to deal with what voters thought was an economy that was not working for them."Voters cast their ballots inside the Arlington County Courthouse on September 18 in Arlington, Virginia. | Tom Brenner/Getty ImagesWhat This Means for the MidtermsGallup's findings are not an isolated indicator. Democrats also hold a substantial lead when Americans are asked which party they would support for Congress, strengthening the argument the party is entering the final month of the midterms campaign with a favorable national image.Analysts and pollsters remain cautious about making any definitive predictions about the results in a month's time, but election simulations, including from RacetotheWH, which looks at voting patterns, polling and other indicators, has given Democrats an 87 percent chance of winning the House. The Senate remained more competitive, at 73 percent.At the same point before the 2018 midterms, when Democrats gained 41 House seats and took control of the chamber, the party led the generic ballot average by 7.2 points, compared to 8.3 points this year, per RealClearPolling.A number of races have shifted toward the Democrats in recent weeks, with early voting underway—something Trump has already claimed is corrupt as he heads on a tour of key GOP seats to campaign, despite not being on the ballot himself. Newsweek’s reporters and editors used Martyn, our AI assistant, to produce this story. Learn more about Martyn here.Update 10/5/26, 6:41 p.m. ET: This article was updated to reflect the Democrats' generic congressional ballot lead as 8.3 percent.Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Samantha Beech and Edward T. CumminsIndependent Journalism Needs You!Become a member for a fresh perspective—ad-free reading, access to our editors, and insight beyond the conventional wisdom.

Oct 06, 2026
CIA Officer David Rush Pleads Guilty as Gold-Bar Fraud Scheme Unravels New

CIA Officer David Rush Pleads Guilty as Gold-Bar Fraud Scheme Unravels

See more of our coverage in your search results. WASHINGTON — A CIA officer charged with stealing tens of millions of dollars’ worth in gold bars and stashing them at his Virginia home pleaded guilty to defrauding the federal government on Tuesday.David Rush, 49, entered the guilty plea in federal court after copping to having fraudulently obtained nearly $194 million by abusing his position to handle top secret matters at the agency.Ex-CIA senior official David Rush allegedly lied his way into a job at the agency with top-secret security clearance and made off with $40 million in gold right under the agency’s nose. Alexandria Sheriff's OfficeRush’s home was raided by the FBI on May 18, as the agency found 303 1-kilogram gold bars worth over $40 million, $2 million in US currency, and 35 luxury watches. ANDREW THOMAS“Federal employees are entrusted with serving the American people, not themselves,” said Attorney General Todd Blanche in a statement. “The Trump Administration is committed to rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, including by prosecuting those who foolishly defraud American taxpayers.”Prosecutors alleged that Rush, who served in the senior executive-level position and held a top secret security clearance, lied about his education and military experience before entering the CIA — and eventually faked an entire program to pilfer government funds.Rush obtained 298 gold bars and also oversaw a total of $145 million in wire transfers that ended up being used to purchase fine watches, luxury real estate and cars.Before being indicted, the CIA had conducted an internal investigation into the movement of the funds and referred the matter to the FBI.The affidavit reveals that Rush acquired the gold bars by requests he made from November 2025 to March 2026 that he needed them for “work-related expenses.” misunseo – stock.adobe.comAgency director John Ratcliffe said in a statement that Rush “abused his position and betrayed the public trust and should be held fully accountable for his actions.”

Oct 06, 2026
7 Self-Protective Habits That Quietly Damage Close Relationships New

7 Self-Protective Habits That Quietly Damage Close Relationships

1. You assume rejection before anyone can explainWhen you expect disappointment, neutral behavior can look personal. A delayed reply becomes disinterest; a tired tone feels like anger. Reacting to that interpretation may create conflict where none existed.Before responding, separate what happened from the meaning you assigned to it. “They answered briefly” is a fact; “They no longer care” is a conclusion. Asking a calm question gives the relationship room to reveal the truth.2. You test people instead of stating your needsSecret tests can feel safer than direct requests. You might stop initiating contact to see whether someone notices, or insist you are fine while hoping they will push harder. The other person does not know the rules, yet their response becomes evidence of how much they care.Clear language is more vulnerable but more accurate. Saying, “I need reassurance today,” creates a real opportunity for connection instead of setting an invisible trap.3. You overexplain to prevent being misunderstoodLong explanations often come from a reasonable wish to avoid judgment. But when every choice arrives with a detailed defense, conversations can feel tense and trust can erode. The hidden message is that disagreement would be dangerous or intolerable.Try offering the essential truth first: “I cannot come tonight because I need rest.” Pause there. You can add context if it is requested, but you do not have to build a courtroom case around every boundary.4. You withdraw before conflict can become uncomfortableTaking space can be healthy; disappearing without explanation is different. Silence may protect you from immediate discomfort, but it leaves the other person alone with uncertainty. Over time, they may stop raising important concerns because they expect the connection to vanish.If you need a pause, name it and include a return point: “I am overwhelmed, but I want to continue this tomorrow.” That preserves safety for both people without forcing a conversation before you are ready.5. You keep score instead of discussing resentmentUnspoken scorekeeping turns kindness into evidence: who called first, apologized more, or carried the heavier burden. It can provide a sense of control, yet the other person may not realize they are falling behind until frustration erupts.Use the pattern as information rather than ammunition. If you are consistently giving more than you can sustain, describe the imbalance while it is still manageable. Honest renegotiation is more useful than presenting a list of charges months later.6. You reject support to avoid feeling dependentExtreme self-reliance can look like strength while quietly limiting intimacy. Refusing every favor, hiding difficult days, or immediately repaying kindness may prevent you from feeling indebted. It also prevents others from experiencing the trust involved in being useful to you.Start small. Accept a ride, admit that you are struggling, or let someone bring dinner without racing to restore the balance. Receiving support does not erase your competence; it allows closeness to move in both directions.7. You mistake emotional intensity for genuine closenessIf unpredictable relationships feel familiar, calm connection may initially seem flat. You might interpret uncertainty, dramatic reconciliation, or constant reassurance-seeking as passion, while steadiness feels suspicious or boring. That reaction does not automatically mean the calmer relationship lacks depth.Notice what remains when the adrenaline is absent: curiosity, respect, reliability, warmth, and room to be yourself. Healthy closeness can be emotionally rich without repeatedly making you fear that the bond is about to disappear.

Oct 06, 2026
Jelena Stupljanin oštro odgovorila Mikiju Manojloviću zbog reči o studentima New

Jelena Stupljanin oštro odgovorila Mikiju Manojloviću zbog reči o studentima

Jelena Stupljanin Foto:TANJUG/ JADRANKA ILIC autor: 06. okt. 2026. 18:05 Glumica Jelena Stupljanin, koja otvoreno podržava Studentsku listu i srpske studente u njihovoj borbi za bolje sutra, oglasila se sada povodom reči koje je izrekao njen kolega Miki Manojlović. Oglas On se, u jednoj emisiji, pitao, između ostalog:"Ta anarhistička ideja, delimičnno, koja je izgubila u oviih 11 tačaka svoj profil i svoju ideju..."Jelena je reagovala na ovo i u snimku objavljenom na Instagramu rekla, između ostalog:"Svaki put kad 99 posto stanovništva kaže - dosta nam je tlačenja, dosta korupcije, dosta uništavanja seljaka i radnika, ljudskih prava... Jedan posto onih najbogatijih u zemlji se oglasi i te ljude nazove anarhistima. Miki, ti svakako živiš najbolji život. Ne čekaš u redovima kod lekara, ne mariš za državne škole i fakultete i vodiš svoje privatno pozorište u Beogradu na vodi.I zato nemaš uvid u stvarni svet. Ja te ne osuđujem. Ti si naš najbolji glumac na svetu, boljii čak i od Laze Ristovskog. Pa i zaslužuješ sve najbolje. Ipak, ti koji podrržavaš evropski put Srbije, ipak sarađuješ i voliš se sa svojim rediteljem Emirom Kusturicom, koji je izričito protiv EU i glasno za Rusiju. Pa kad ste vas dvojica uspeli da snnimite film zajedno, sigurno će uspeti da se dogovore i svii najbolji studenti koje imamo, a koji već dve godinne genijalno vode borbu protiiv korupcije ii mafije.A dok tvoj Vučić rasprodaje naša sela i gradove, studenti brane Srbiju od spoljnih sila tako što čuvaju njen suverenitet. Jje l' znnaš šta znači ta reč? To je kad ne izdaješ svoje ljude na Kosovu da bi sačuvao svoju fotelju..."Celo Jelenniino obraćanje poslušajte u prilogu u tekstu. Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama: Koje je tvoje mišljenje o ovoj temi? Učestvuj u diskusiji ili pročitaj komentare

Oct 06, 2026