Browse

Latest Headlines

Fresh headlines, crisp visuals — faster reading.

Bill Belichick and Jordon Hudson Secretly Split Last Year, Remain Business Partners New

Bill Belichick and Jordon Hudson Secretly Split Last Year, Remain Business Partners

See more of our coverage in your search results. It’s reportedly game over for Bill Belichick and his much-younger girlfriend, Jordon Hudson.The North Carolina Tar Heels football head coach, 74, and the beauty queen, 25, have apparently called it quits, with TMZ reporting that they secretly split “late last year.”The outlet’s source noted that, while the two are no longer dating, they remain “committed to their business partnerships and remain close friends.”No other details, including the cause of their breakup or who ended the relationship, were shared.Bill Belichick and Jordon Hudson, seen here in a selfie from December 2024, have called it quits. Instagram/ Jordon HudsonAccording to TMZ, the age-gap couple (seen here in May) secretly split “late last year” but remain “committed to their business partnerships and remain close friends.” Getty ImagesDespite ending things last year, Belichick and Hudson have maintained a united front, not letting their breakup make waves — until now.The two have appeared at events all year, including the Kentucky Derby in May and the UNC football game at home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, against Syracuse on Oct. 24.Page Six has reached out to Belichick and Hudson for comment, but has not heard back.Just last month, Belichick shot down the widespread rumor that Hudson was managing his football coaching career, calling the idea “ridiculous” in a Wall Street Journal interview.Despite their split, the former couple stepped out together at the Kentucky Derby in May (as pictured here). Getty Images for Churchill DownsHudson was photographed on the sidelines of a North Carolina Tar Heels football game Belichick was coaching as recently as last weekend (as seen here). Filmsbyjosh / BACKGRIDThe claims took hold when the former cheerleader was often spotted on the sidelines at his games and when Hudson famously stopped questions about the origins of their relationship.The former New England Patriots head coach called the idea that Hudson was overly involved in his coaching duties “just a flat-out lie,” noting, “There are some things that she helps me schedule or look at.”While being interviewed by Tony Dokoupil for “CBS Sunday Morning” in April 2025, Hudson interrupted when the journalist asked Belichick how their relationship began.Last month, Belichick shot down the widespread rumor that Hudson (pictured above earlier this month at a UNC game) was managing his football coaching career, telling the Wall Street Journal the suggestion was “ridiculous.” Icon Sportswire via Getty ImagesHudson had famously interrupted a “CBS Sunday Morning” interview for Belichick in April 2025 (seen above) when journalist Tony Dokoupil asked how their relationship began. CBS“We’re not talking about that,” she said bluntly from off-camera.In a voiceover, Dokoupil noted that Hudson was a “constant presence” throughout the interview.In the same interview, when asked about how he handled criticism of their nearly 50-year age gap, Belichick replied, “I’ve never been too worried about what everybody else thinks.”He added, “Just try to do what I feel like is best for me and what’s right.”Belichick defended Hudson after the interview, saying she had spoken up to “refocus the discussion” on the former New England Patriots head coach’s book he was meant to be promoting. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters ConnectBelichick and Hudson (seen here in a social media upload) allegedly had their first encounter on a plane in 2021 and began to date a few years later. jordon_isabella/InstagramAfter the interview, Belichick issued a statement, saying he’d been “surprised when unrelated topics were introduced” that didn’t pertain to his book, “The Art of Winning: Lessons from My Life in Football,” which he was promoting at the time.He said this “occurred several times” and that Hudson — with whom he enjoys a “personal and professional relationship” — spoke up to “reiterate that point to help refocus the discussion.”Belichick also alleged that the final cut presented “selectively edited clips and stills from just a few minutes of the interview to suggest a false narrative — that Jordon was attempting to control the conversation — which is simply not true.”The legendary football coach and Hudson allegedly first met on a plane in 2021, before they began dating a few years later. Community GuidelinesWelcome to the Page Six Community!Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.Simply put, keep it civil.Your post will/might be rejected if it contains: Spam Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice: Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk So, how can you be a power user? Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across. 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions! Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules. Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Oct 31, 2026
Selma Blair Issues Apology After Alleged In-Flight Incident Involving Flight Attendant New

Selma Blair Issues Apology After Alleged In-Flight Incident Involving Flight Attendant

Published 23:04 30 Oct 2026 GMTThe actress apologised to fans and passengers following an alleged October 11 plane disturbance, revealing she is focusing on her health.Selma Blair has publicly broken her silence following an alleged in-flight altercation earlier this month, issuing an emotional apology to those she 'hurt' or 'frightened' while confirming an ongoing legal matter.The 54-year-old actress addressed the situation directly in a video statement released weeks after an October 11 flight incident during which she allegedly bit a flight attendant, prompting widespread media attention and ongoing scrutiny.Speaking directly to fans, Blair acknowledged her recent quietness and expressed sincere regret over the delay in speaking out publicly.“Hi, it's me. And I know I've been quiet for a couple of weeks since October eleventh, and you deserve to hear from me directly, and I'm sorry that it's taken this long,” Blair shared.AdvertAddressing why she could not detail the specifics of the mid-air disruption, Blair cited strict advice from her legal counsel as proceedings continue behind closed doors.“There is a legal matter going on, and my lawyers have asked me to not say anything about that day, and I'm listening to them. And I take this very seriously,” she explained.Despite the legal constraints, the Cruel Intentions and Legally Blonde star offered an unreserved apology to those impacted by the incident, insisting she never had any malicious intentions.“What I can tell you, though, is very simple and the truest thing I know about myself, and that not one day ever have I intended to hurt or frighten anyone a day in my life,” Blair continued. “And so to the people that I disappointed, that I hurt, that I frightened, alarmed, I am so sorry.”Blair, who has been widely admired for her candour while navigating chronic health battles following her 2018 multiple sclerosis diagnosis, also thanked supporters who reached out during the recent fallout. She confirmed that both her teenage son, Arthur, and her service dog, Scout, are safe and supported.“And to the people that have written or called or sent wishes of love or caring, it has meant everything to me and my son, who is my world, as is Scout, who is also okay,” she added. “So right now I'm going to be taking care of my health and my son and thinking of you all with gratitude and love.”Selma appeared in court on October 12 following the incident (Barry Williams / New York Daily News via Getty Images)The video marks the first time Blair herself has spoken publicly about the October 11 flight to New York, during which she was arrested after allegedly biting and punching a flight attendant. She was also accused of attempting to open an aircraft door mid-flight, with two flight crew members reporting injuries.Following the incident, the star was charged with two counts of assault—one involving a police officer and another involving a nurse. Blair has pleaded not guilty to all charges.Her representatives previously pushed back against the public narrative in a statement released shortly after the flight, maintaining: “Since Sunday night, the public account of what happened to Selma aboard a flight to New York has been built almost entirely on a police statement and a decade-old headline."A handful of journalists have taken the time to report on Selma as a human being rather than a headline, and we are grateful to them. But fair reporting has been the exception, and in the space left by our silence, speculation has hardened into something being treated as fact."We can, however, correct the record on a few points already in public circulation. Selma Blair experienced a medical emergency on the flight. There was no attempt to open the door of the aircraft. Selma did not intend to harm anyone.”Featured Image Credit: Instagram/@SelmaBlairTopics: Celebrity, Crime

Oct 30, 2026
Nelly Was Paid $50,000 by Taylor Swift for a 3-Minute Performance, Delivered in a McDonald's Bag New

Nelly Was Paid $50,000 by Taylor Swift for a 3-Minute Performance, Delivered in a McDonald's Bag

See more of our coverage in your search results. Taylor Swift paid Nelly $50,000 for a surprise performance that lasted just three minutes — and she gave him the cash in a McDonald’s bag.The rapper made the odd request after Swift called him “out of the blue” and asked to join her onstage in Houston, Texas, as a “really big favor” in 2011, he told “Breakfast Club” listeners Wednesday.Swift, who Nelly had known “for a long time,” said over the phone that she and her friends had “made a routine to ‘Hot in Herre'” the previous evening and wanted to fly him out from St. Louis.Nelly spilled on “The Breakfast Club” Wednesday about Taylor Swift (pictured above in September 2015) paying him $500,000 for a three-minute performance. Dilip Vishwanat/LP5The rapper joined Swift onstage for the first time in 2011 in Texas after she called him “out of the blue.” Breakfast Club Power 105.1 FM/ YoutubeAlthough the 36-year-old said she didn’t “really have a budget” at the time and didn’t want to “disrespect” Nelly, she offered him the five-figure sum, as well as a ride on her private plane and a presidential suite stay at the Four Seasons.“I said, ‘Can you put that [money] in a McDonald’s bag?'” Nelly recalled, noting that sure enough, “her manager, Robert Allen … toss[ed him] a McDonald’s bag with $50,000 in cash.”The “Ride Wit Me” hitmaker, who “never even saw” the luxury hotel room because he went straight from the show to the airport, wouldn’t have performed “for free” and money wasn’t “an issue.”The pop star (pictured above in September 2015) paid for Nelly’s hotel stay and flew him in on her private plane. Dilip Vishwanat/LP5When she offered him the five-figure payment, he requested it be paid in a McDonalds bag. Dilip Vishwanat/LP5However, he gushed, “It was hilarious. I’ll take it.”Nelly, 51, performed “Just a Dream” at the 2011 show, which was part of Swift’s “Speak Now” tour.He joined her onstage again two years later for the “Red” tour, treating audience members to a performance of “Hey Porsche” that time around.Swift’s manager did just that, which Nelly (pictured above in September 2015) called “hilarious.” Dilip Vishwanat/LP5Nelly (pictured above on March 8) has appeared onstage during the “Love Story” hitmaker’s tours three times total over the years. WireImageIn 2015, he sang “Hot in Herre” during a stop on the pop star’s “1989” world tour.Swift, for her part, has “popped out at some of [his] shows” over the years and sang “Dilemma” with him.Nelly gushed on Wednesday that, “hell yeah,” he considers himself a Swiftie.Nelly (pictured above on Sept. 6) declared himself a Swiftie during the interview. AFP via Getty ImagesThe “Dilemma” singer also opened up about attending Swift (pictured above on Oct. 17) and Travis Kelce’s July wedding. Matt Baron/BEI/ShutterstockHe and his wife, Ashanti, attended Swift’s July wedding to Travis Kelce at New York City’s Madison Square Garden.Nelly defended the nuptials’ massive — and star-studded — guest list, saying “you make a lot of friends” during a longstanding career like hers.“People forget how long she’s actually been in the business,” he said. “And at the top of it. … And her husband might go down as the greatest tight end of all time by the time this is done.” Community GuidelinesWelcome to the Page Six Community!Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.Simply put, keep it civil.Your post will/might be rejected if it contains: Spam Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice: Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk So, how can you be a power user? Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across. 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions! Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules. Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Oct 30, 2026
Serbian Prosecutor Reopens Radoičić Case: Why Was He Released After the Banjskë Attack? New

Serbian Prosecutor Reopens Radoičić Case: Why Was He Released After the Banjskë Attack?

21:37 | 30 Tetor 2026 Nën mbikëqyrjen e Komisionit të Prokurorisë së Lartë Publike të Serbisë, me udhëzim të kryeprokurores Zagorka Dolovac, është edhe rasti kundër biznesmenit kontrovers Milan Radoiçiq, i dyshuar për organizimin e sulmit terrorist në Banjskë, në veri të Kosovës.Vëmendje e veçantë po i kushtohet rrethanave në të cilat Radoiçiqit nuk iu caktua masa e paraburgimit pas marrjes në pyetje në Prokurorinë e Lartë Publike në Beograd, pavarësisht rëndësisë së veprave penale për të cilat dyshohet.Sipas informacioneve të portalit nova.rs, një nga arsyet e përmendura për moscaktimin e paraburgimit ishte edhe fakti se prokurori i atëhershëm, Nikola Panteliq, në kërkesën e tij për caktimin e kësaj mase kishte paraqitur vetëm një rrethanë që mund të tregonte se Radoiçiqi, nëse do të qëndronte i lirë, mund ta pengonte procedurën. Bëhej fjalë për rrezikun e arratisjes, ndonëse kjo rrethanë konsiderohej e pabazuar, pasi Radoiçiqi ishte dorëzuar vetë dhe ishte paraqitur vullnetarisht për t’u marrë në pyetje në Prokurorinë e Lartë Publike.Komisioni pritet të shqyrtojë edhe arsyet përse prokurori Panteliq nuk iu referua tri rrethanave të tjera që mund të justifikonin caktimin e paraburgimit: rrezikut të përsëritjes së veprës penale, ndikimit te dëshmitarët dhe shqetësimit të opinionit publik.Panteliqi ndërkohë është avancuar në pozitën e shefit të Prokurorisë së Lartë Publike në Pançevë.Gjykata e refuzoi kërkesën për paraburgimPas përfundimit të marrjes në pyetje të Radoiçiqit, prokurori kishte kërkuar që atij t’i caktohej paraburgimi deri në 30 ditë. Në kërkesë ishte theksuar edhe se ai herë pas here qëndronte jashtë vendbanimit të tij për më shumë se 90 ditë, pa e raportuar këtë.Megjithatë, gjyqtarja që trajtonte rastin e refuzoi kërkesën, duke vlerësuar se lidhjet personale, familjare dhe pasurore të Radoiçiqit me Beogradin, paraqitja vullnetare në polici dhe dorëzimi i pasaportës ishin të mjaftueshme për të garantuar praninë e tij në procedurë. Në vend të paraburgimit, ndaj tij u vendosën disa masa kufizuese. Atij iu ndalua largimi nga Serbia pa miratimin e gjykatës, iu konfiskua përkohësisht pasaporta dhe iu caktua detyrimi që të paraqitej rregullisht në polici.Gjithashtu, gjykata ia ndaloi udhëtimin drejt Kosovës, duke e paralajmëruar se mund t’i caktohej paraburgimi nëse shkelte ndalesat dhe detyrimet e përcaktuara.Kryeprokurorja Zagorka Dolovac kishte nxjerrë një udhëzim të detyrueshëm për të gjitha 87 prokuroritë në Serbi, duke kërkuar që anëtarëve të një komisioni të posaçëm t’u mundësohej qasja në çdo lëndë që ata kërkojnë të shqyrtojnë.Mbikëqyrja përfshin veçanërisht rastet që lidhen me veprat penale kundër jetës dhe trupit, lirive dhe të drejtave të qytetarëve, të drejtave zgjedhore, ekonomisë, rendit kushtetues dhe sigurisë së Serbisë, si dhe detyrës zyrtare. Moszbatimi i këtij udhëzimi përbën shkelje disiplinore.Çfarë ndodhi në Banjskë?Sulmi i armatosur në Banjskë ndodhi më 24 shtator 2023, kur u vra polici i Kosovës, Afrim Bunjaku. Gjatë shkëmbimit të zjarrit mes policisë së Kosovës dhe grupit të armatosur u vranë edhe tre pjesëtarë të këtij grupi: Stefan Nedeljkoviq, Bojan Mijailoviq dhe Igor Milenkoviq.Pas ngjarjeve, Radoiçiqi mori përgjegjësinë për organizimin e grupit të armatosur.Përmes avokatit të tij, Goran Petronijeviq, ai deklaroi se më 24 shtator kishte shkuar me bashkëkombësit e tij në veri të Kosovës, me synimin për të inkurajuar popullin serb në rezistencën ndaj Qeverisë së Albin Kurtit dhe për të realizuar, siç ishte shprehur, ëndrrën për lirinë e popullit serb.Ai pretendoi gjithashtu se Beogradi nuk kishte pasur dijeni për qëndrimin e tij në Kosovë.Ndërkohë, derisa Radoiçiqi vazhdon të jetë i lirë në Serbi, disa serbë të përfshirë në rastin e Banjskës janë dënuar në Kosovë me vite të gjata burgimi, ndërsa dy prej tyre me burgim të përjetshëm.

Oct 30, 2026
Celebrity Traitors 2026: Faithfuls Romesh Ranganathan and Sebastian Croft Triumph in Unforeseen Finale New

Celebrity Traitors 2026: Faithfuls Romesh Ranganathan and Sebastian Croft Triumph in Unforeseen Finale

Warning: This story contains Celebrity Traitors spoilers.The second series of the Celebrity Traitors ended with an unbelievable twist as faithfuls Romesh Ranganathan and Sebastian Croft were crowned the winners of the hit BBC show following an explosive endgame moment.After weeks on screens and a dramatic endgame, it was a rare win for the Faithfuls in a twist 'nobody saw coming'.At the endgame, it all came down to solo Traitor Kenny against remaining Faithfuls Sebastian, James, Romesh and Leigh-Anne.AdvertDuring the tense showdown, Little Mix star Leigh-Anne was the first to be given the boot and banished from the castle.The final endgame was tense (BBC)But this still wasn't the end, as players voted to banish again which split the vote between King Kenny and James Blunt.After a deadlock, Sebastian and Romesh conferred and instead banished Kenny, leaving just the final three Faithful at the roundtable in a shock final change up.Kenny was the final Traitor to go (BBC)But after three banishments, it all came down to a final hurdle as James opted to vote for one another, giving Sebastian the final vote and equally banishing James in a shocking revelation.As Sebastian and Romesh both trusted one another, the two faithful walked away splitting the prize fund of £83,000.Charities Choose Love and Refugee Council were their organisations of choice.The Faithfuls won the Traitors (BBC)But it was an ending nobody really expected, with many convinced Kenny had it in the bag."OMG THE FAITHFULS HAVE WON I DID NOT SEE THAT COMING," one person posted on X.Another meanwhile said: "Wow the faithfuls actually won this time. I can't believe it."Earlier in the final episode, Maya came under fire in the final last roundtable from all angles for her behaviour throughout the season and was unable to convince her fellow players she was faithful.Fellow Traitor King Kenny was also forced to write her name on his chalkboard in a final bid to avoid suspicion.She had faced fierce criticism from James Blunt over the 'perfume theory' and the plain-sight killing of Ross Kemp. However, she was unable to actually reveal her identity as she left the roundtable.Maya was eliminated at the last roundtable (BBC)But it turned out a 'good luck' comment from Maya as she left the roundtable raised further suspicion ahead of the endgame.Fans say Maya 'deserved' winThere’s no denying Maya Jama would’ve been a deserving winner.The only original remaining Traitor of the series, she largely escaped suspicion until the last hurdle, and threw her teammates James, Richard and Hannah under the bus when necessary.She also held court in the turret, hitting back at negative comments online after she dressed down James Acaster for his lack of involvement in the puzzles task, refusing to remove his blindfold and help out, telling him: "James, you did leave us out to dry. You did."“I do feel for maya tho & hope she plays her way through this, she deserves that win!,” one user wrote on X ahead of the episode as another quipped: “Two out of the three traitors she has worked with have just openly admitted they’re a traitor.”Maya Jama was the only original Traitor (BBC)“I’ve outlasted every challenge that’s been thrown my way” she said at the opening of the finale episode.She was awarded her wish of being a Traitor, admitting before the show aired: "I'd love to play someone who's the complete opposite of me, a proper villain or someone really evil. Maybe this is my chance to test that out."After her banishment, fans rushed to social media as one user wrote: "Maya deserved to win, Kenny doesn’t."Another posted: "Props to maya for making it so far considering the fact that the other traitors didnt really help."The second series victory follows Alan Carr’s mammoth victory as a Traitor last year against David Olusoga, Nick Mohammed, and Joe Marler.Before Friday’s final this year, it looked like remaining Traitors Maya and Kenny had potentially shot themselves in the foot and paved the way for a Faithful win after the murder of Sharon Rooney.This came after Kenny, who had the two-vote dagger, decided to switch his vote and banish Joanne McNally at the eleventh hour.Their decision to then banish Sharon, who equally had heat on her, baffled a lot of the Faithfuls the next day and as it went on, they suddenly all seemed to suspect the three Traitors.Sharon Rooney faced heat in the Traitors before she was murdered (BBC)It was one of the few times that Maya received any heat the entire season, after the discussion came around again about who was in the room when Ross Kemp was murdered in plain sight.The semi-final had drawn in the highest peak audience of the series, with 10.7 million tuning in. The show has been a ratings winner for the broadcaster.And at the beginning of Friday night’s final, eagle-eyed Faithful Michael Sheen was dramatically killed off in the last murder of the series, in a move fans called ‘obvious’ and ‘stupid’.But that wasn’t the only shock twist, as original Traitor Maya was banished without revealing her true identity.The final roundtable (BBC)The end to a dramatic seasonThis latest season certainly hasn't been short of unexpected drama.From Richard E Grant’s major blunder, when he appeared to accidentally reveal his identity as a Traitor in the first episode, to James Acaster being recruited into the secret group but calling himself the ‘reluctant Traitor’, the series has delivered plenty of tense TV moments.The most recent of those came on Thursday night’s episode (29 October) when comedian James left both his fellow contestants and viewers at home stunned.In a Traitors-first, he admitted his role as a Traitor during the roundtable while facing heat from Michael Sheen, cracking under the pressure and making a full confession before he was subsequently banished.It meant he was out of the running, leaving original Traitor Maya Jama, and the recruited King Kenny left to fend for themselves against Faithfuls Michael Sheen, James Blunt, Romesh Ranganathan, Leigh-Anne Pinnock and Sebastian Croft.James had been recruited as a Traitor but seemed fundamentally uncomfortable with the job.The penultimate episode also saw Maya, who had just an episode earlier been unbelievably voted one of the most trustworthy along with two fellow Traitors James and Kenny, make a slip of the tongue which viewers suggested could’ve seen her banished.As she raised her glass to clink ‘cheers’, she accidentally toasted ‘to killing them’ before quickly realising her mistake and correcting herself by saying: "To banishing them, even."Michael Sheen's risky exitAfter a rocky season, with the likes of Michael Sheen and James Blunt repeatedly putting their money on the wrong Faithfuls resulting in their banishment, including actress Julie Hesmondalgh, Sheen then flipped the switch and was actually bang on the money when leading the charge to the final.Michael Sheen reacting to his murder (BBC)Maya Jama and James Acaster decided to murder Sharon Rooney – something viewers thought they would ultimately pay the price for.The rogue decision confused a lot of the Faithfuls the next day and as it went on, they suddenly all seemed to suspect the three Traitors.Of course, this then led to the baffling round table that saw Maya under incredible heat from a spot-on Michael Sheen before James decided to throw the towel in and confessed to being a Traitor.Sharon’s murder was dubbed a mistake, due to the heat she had on her at the dead-locked roundtable with Joanne McNally.However it allowed Michael Sheen to emerge as one of the season's most determined Traitor hunters, with his suspicions about Maya Jama and the others helping to set up the explosive endgame.He was also able to suss out James Acaster before his bombshell admission before he was murdered at the last hurdle.

Oct 30, 2026
Valjevski studenti traže ostavke petorice policijskih rukovodilaca zbog brutalnosti New

Valjevski studenti traže ostavke petorice policijskih rukovodilaca zbog brutalnosti

Foto:Amir Hamzagić/Nova.rs/Instagram/valjevski_studenti/valjevski.zbor/ Valjevo_live/Video/Društvene mreže autor: 30. okt. 2026. 22:05 Javnom tužilaštvu za organizovani kriminal (JTOK) povodom policijskog nasilja u Valjevu naknadno je podneto još sedam krivičnih prijava, a poslednja 5. oktobra ove godine, saznaje Nova.rs. Tužilaštvo je u dosadašnjem toku predistražnog postupka razgovaralo sa 33 oštećena i ispitalo osam svedoka, dok iz medicinske dokumentacije proizilazi da je jedan oštećeni zadobio teške telesne povrede. U međuvremenu, valjevski studenti i građani traže ostavke petorice policijskih rukovodilaca, a građani ispred policijske stanice čitaju imena onih za koje smatraju da snose odgovornost za nasilje tokom protesta u avgustu prošle godine. Oglas Zahtev za neopozive ostavke upućen je načelniku Policijske uprave Valjevo Vladi Jeriniću, njegovom zameniku Milanu Simiću, načelniku Odeljenja policije Draganu Dobrisavljeviću, načelniku Odeljenja saobraćajne policije Predragu Radosavljeviću i komandiru Policijske ispostave Valjevo Milanu Cvijiću.„Lustracija je počela ovog trenutka. Po lancu komandne odgovornosti imaju 24 časa da podnesu ostavke. Ovo nije ultimatum, ovo je upozorenje“, poručio je okupljenima ispred zgrade Policijske uprave Vladimir Janković, bivši potpukovnik policije iz Valjeva.Studenti i građani ne traže samo odgovornost neposrednih izvršilaca policijskog nasilja već i odgovornost rukovodilaca koji se nalaze na čelu policijske uprave i njenih organizacionih jedinica.Oni su pokušala da uruče zahtev policijskom rukovodstvu, ali su ih, pre nekoliko dana, na ulazu dočekala zatvorena vrata i ugašena svetla. Iako su tražili da uđu i razgovaraju sa predstavnicima policije, odgovora nije bilo.Noć u kojoj su policajci tukli i ljude koji nisu bili na protestuDa bi se razumelo zbog čega je pitanje odgovornosti policije ponovo u središtu pažnje u Valjevu, treba se vratiti na protest održan 14. avgusta 2025. godine.Te noći gradom su se proširili snimci policajaca koji udaraju građane, uključujući ljude koji su već ležali na betonu i nisu pružali otpor. Na meti su se našli učesnici protesta, ali i ljudi koji su se zatekli na ulici ili u obližnjim lokalima.Neki od pretučenih građana kasnije su svedočili da su ih policajci izvlačili iz objekata, tukli na ulici, a potom privodili. Pojedini su tvrdili da im nije pružena odgovarajuća medicinska pomoć, iako su imali vidljive povrede.Ni danas nije razjašnjeno zbog čega je policijska intervencija u Valjevu prerasla u nasilje takvih razmera. Ostalo je otvoreno pitanje da li je reč o postupanju koje je izmaklo kontroli ili o naređenju da se sila primenjuje u što većoj meri. Dodatnu zabrinutost izazvala je činjenica da su u intervenciji učestvovali i policajci iz drugih gradova.Jedno od najupečatljivijih svedočenja dao je mladić iz Valjeva koji je te večeri sa prijateljima otišao u kladionicu da gleda utakmicu Partizana i Hibernijana. Nakon završetka meča, društvo je krenulo kući, ali se vratilo u lokal kada je primetilo da se nešto dešava na ulici.Tada je, kako je ispričao za Novu, u kladionicu upalo između deset i 15 policajaca.„U kladionicu je upalo 10-15 policajaca i počeli su da biju sve redom. Ja sam pokušao da izađem na druga vrata, ali su me trojica stigla. Tukli su me i tu i ispred, pored marice. Nisu mnogo pričali, samo su tukli“, ispričao je mladić, čiji identitet nije objavljen na njegov zahtev.Kako je naveo, nikada ranije nije učestvovao na protestima, nije bio politički opredeljen i nije razumeo zbog čega je postao meta policije.„Prvi udarac sam dobio sa leđa. Nisam pružao nikakav otpor, jer sam se plašio da ću dobiti još batina, ali su oni nastavili da nas biju. Tukli su nas i tu unutra, a onda i kada su nas izveli, pored marice“, rekao je.Policajci su ga, prema njegovom svedočenju, udarali pesnicama u lice, po ustima i nosu, kao i pendrecima po leđima i nogama.Nakon prebijanja je priveden. Pošto, kako mu je rečeno, nije bilo mesta u policijskoj stanici, odveden je u istražni zatvor u Kazneno-popravnom domu u Valjevu, gde je proveo između deset i 12 sati, pre nego što je pušten.„Imao sam tragove od udaraca na licu, na ustima i nosu. Tu su me udarali pesnicama. Udarali su nas i pendrecima. Mene su udarali po leđima i nogama“, ispričao je.I gotovo godinu dana kasnije, kako je rekao za Novu, nije znao zbog čega su ga policajci tukli niti zašto su ga uhapsili.Njegovo svedočenje pokazuje da nasilje te noći nije bilo ograničeno na učesnike protesta. Prema iskazima oštećenih, policajci su udarali i ljude koji su pokušavali da se sklone od dešavanja, a među njima je bilo i mladih koji nisu imali nikakve veze sa demonstracijama.Oko 30 oštećenih, 28 prijavljenih policajaca i istraga JTOK-aNakon događaja u Valjevu, 27 oštećenih podnelo je krivičnu prijavu protiv 28 policijskih službenika zbog sumnje na zlostavljanje i mučenje. Među prijavljenima su bili rukovodioci i policajci iz više policijskih uprava i stanica, uključujući Valjevo, Mionicu, Ljig, Ub, Osečinu, Prijepolje, Priboj i Užice, kao i nepoznati policijski službenici.Advokat Milan Mijailović, koji zastupa deo oštećenih, rekao je za Novu da pravni tim zastupa oko 30 građana, među kojima ima i maloletnika.„Ljude su izvlačili iz lokala i tukli na ulici, neki od onih koji su dobili batine čak nisu ni učestvovali na protestu“, naveo je Mijailović.Prema njegovim rečima, neki građani koji su ranije ćutali odlučili su da daju iskaze kada su saznali da je JTOK preuzeo predmet. Specijalni sud Foto:FoNet/Milica Vučković U odgovoru na pitanja Nove.rs, JTOK je naveo da su spisi predmeta Osnovnog javnog tužilaštva u Valjevu, formirani po krivičnoj prijavi 27 oštećenih zbog događaja od 14. i 15. avgusta 2025. godine, dostavljeni tom tužilaštvu 15. maja 2026. godine, zajedno sa rešenjem Vrhovnog javnog tužilaštva od 14. maja.Sa spisima je dostavljen i izveštaj Sektora unutrašnje kontrole MUP-a, sa prikupljenim obaveštenjima od policijskih službenika, o čemu su sačinjene službene beleške. Izveštaj je prethodno izrađen po zahtevu Osnovnog javnog tužilaštva u Valjevu.JTOK je potvrdio da su mu nakon toga, povodom istog događaja, dostavljene krivične prijave još sedam oštećenih lica. Poslednja prijava podneta je 5. oktobra 2026. godine.„U dosadašnjem toku predistražnog postupka, Javno tužilaštvo za organizovani kriminal je obavilo razgovor sa 33 oštećena i ispitalo osam svedoka. Iz prikupljene medicinske dokumentacije proizilazi da je jedan oštećeni zadobio teške telesne povrede“, navodi se u odgovoru JTOK-a.Tužilaštvo je potvrdilo i da su na održavanju javnog reda i mira tokom okupljanja građana 14. i 15. avgusta prošle godine u Valjevu bili angažovani pripadnici policijskih uprava u Valjevu, Užicu i Prijepolju. JTOK-u su iz sve tri uprave dostavljeni izveštaji o angažovanju pripadnika interventnih jedinica policije tokom ta dva dana.U nastavku predistražnog postupka zakazano je prikupljanje obaveštenja od još dva oštećena. Naloženo je i veštačenje telesnih povreda oštećenih koji su naknadno podneli krivične prijave ili dostavili medicinsku dokumentaciju, kao i prikupljanje drugih potrebnih podataka radi utvrđivanja potpunog činjeničnog stanja.JTOK je naveo da u ovoj fazi ne može da dostavi više podataka jer je predistražni postupak u toku. Kako su objasnili, objavljivanje dodatnih informacija moglo bi da oteža prikupljanje i obezbeđivanje dokaza u odnosu na sve učesnike postupka.Postupak protiv Katarine Petrović i oduzimanje čina njenom supruguPored ostavki policijskih rukovodilaca, studenti su zatražili i obustavljanje disciplinskih postupaka protiv policajke Katarine Petrović, njen povratak na posao, kao i preispitivanje postupaka protiv njenog supruga Gorana Petrovića kome je i zvanično MUP oduzeo čin.Katarina Petrović je majorka policije iz Valjeva koja je obelodanila policijski izveštaj o saobraćajnoj nezgodi koju je izazvao Nikola Petrović, kum predsednika Srbije Aleksandra Vučića. Zbog toga je protiv nje vođen krivični postupak zbog odavanja službene tajne. Viši sud u Valjevu oslobodio ju je optužbe, a oslobađajuća presuda je potom potvrđena. Katarina Petrović. Promocija knjige Na putu ka slobodi, autorke Katarine Petrović Foto: Filip Krainčanić/Nova.rs Međutim, njeni problemi u MUP-u time nisu završeni. U martu ove godine ponovo je privremeno udaljena sa posla, nakon disciplinske prijave zbog izjava koje je dala na promociji svoje knjige „Na putu ka slobodi“.U međuvremenu je disciplinski postupak pokrenut i protiv njenog supruga Gorana Petrovića, oficira saobraćajne policije u Valjevu. Njemu je izrečena mera oduzimanja stečenog čina i određivanja nižeg čina zbog karikature objavljene na privatnom Fejsbuk profilu u novembru 2024. godine.Kako je objavila Nova.rs, Petrović je podneo prigovor na prvostepenu odluku, ukazujući na nepravilnosti u postupku. Posebnu pažnju izazvala je činjenica da su četvorica policajaca koji su svedočili protiv njega, prema navodima iz prigovora, isti oni protiv kojih se vodi predistražni postupak zbog prebijanja građana u Valjevu.Taj podatak dodatno je povezao disciplinske postupke protiv Petrovića sa slučajem policijskog nasilja, zbog kojeg građani i dalje čekaju odgovor institucija.Zahtev studenata da se obustave postupci protiv Katarine Petrović i preispitaju postupci protiv njenog supruga zato je deo šireg zahteva za odgovornost i drugačiji odnos policije prema građanima, ali i prema pripadnicima sopstvenih redova. Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama: Koje je tvoje mišljenje o ovoj temi? Učestvuj u diskusiji ili pročitaj komentare

Oct 30, 2026
Starting Next Year, Albanian Children Will Stay in School Until 5 PM New

Starting Next Year, Albanian Children Will Stay in School Until 5 PM

18:25 | 30 Tetor 2026 Gjatë fjalës së tij këtë pasdite, kryeministri Edi Rama njoftoi se duke nisur nga viti i ardhshëm, fëmijët do të qëndrojnë në shkollë deri në orën 17:00.Kjo do të ndihmojë prindërit që punojnë, ndërsa fëmijët do të merren me aktivitete kulturore e sportive që ndihmojnë edhe socializimin e tyre.“Tjetra është puna që duhet bërë bashkërisht mes nesh e shoqërisë civile për të rritur gamën e aktiviteteve sociale të fëmijëve nga sporti te kultura, në mes të të cilave janë të gjitha pjesët që kanë të bëjnë me skenën, pikturën, zejet, fotografinë e me radhë. Zgjatja e qëndrimit të fëmijëve në shkollë do të fillojë menjëherë vitin e ardhshëm. Kemi vendosur një buxhet që prindërit të punojnë dhe fëmijët do të jenë në shkollë deri në 5 pasdite”, tha Rama. Ajo çfarë bëri të ditur Rama gjithashtu ishte dhe konsultimi me prindërit dhe mësuesit për kufizimin e rrjeteve sociale për të miturit.

Oct 30, 2026
Chrissy Metz Embraces 100-Lb Weight Loss and Reveals GLP-1 Benefits for Stage Performance New

Chrissy Metz Embraces 100-Lb Weight Loss and Reveals GLP-1 Benefits for Stage Performance

See more of our coverage in your search results. Chrissy Metz flaunted her 100-pound weight loss as she gushed about the “super helpful” side effects of using a GLP-1.The “This Is Us” alum stunned in a green velvet gown at the “Nocturne” premiere over the weekend and shared how much using a weight-loss drug has helped her as she makes her Broadway debut in “& Juliet.”“I think, honestly, being able to run around a stage eight shows a week was like really, really amazing,” she told ET on the carpet, noting that the GLP-1 has “really minimized” her inflammation.Chrissy Metz (pictured Sunday) flaunted her 100-pound weight loss as she gushed about the “super helpful” side effects of using a GLP-1. Apple TV via Getty ImagesThe actress shared how much using a weight-loss drug has helped her as she makes her Broadway debut in “& Juliet.” Ulices Ramales / BACKGRID“I’m perimenopausal, I got knee issues, there’s things going on,” Metz continued. “Just the mental capacity to have other things to think about than obsessing about the food noise, that’s been super, super helpful. It’s been great.”Back in August, the “Breakthrough” actress gave a candid “progress report” about her GLP-1 journey.“Look at him,” the 45-year-old said while showing off her bicep on her Instagram Story. “You know, I love all my blips and blops and my flips and flops, but she’s making progress on the strength training journey.”“I think, honestly, being able to run around a stage eight shows a week was like really, really amazing,” Metz (pictured at the 2019 Emmys) told ET. FilmMagicThe “This Is Us” alum (pictured in September 2019) noted how the weight loss drug has “really minimized” her inflammation and food noise. NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty ImagesMetz continued, “She’s making progress. We like progress. That’s my progress report.”That same month, the Emmy nominee revealed she’s taking a GLP-1 after losing 100 pounds last year.Metz told People she finally came to the decision after years of ineffective diets and called her experience with the medication “great” after having been skeptical.The Emmy-nominated actress (pictured in June) revealed that she began her GLP-1 journey in August. Bruce Glikas/Getty ImagesMetz (pictured in April) lost 100 pounds just in the last year. Getty Images“It’s so nice not to be obsessing about what I’m going to have every minute, even as I’m still consuming the meal,” she explained.“I just vilified food for so long because I was taught that it was bad, and you shouldn’t eat this or that.”In April 2025, Metz told the Daily Mail she had lost 100 pounds thanks to strength training. When asked if she would ever try Ozempic, she gave a diplomatic answer.The actress (pictured in 2020) dodged the Daily Mail’s question when she was asked in April 2025 if she would ever try Ozempic. Getty Images“It’s something I feel like, it is so personal, and sure, I think it’s important to like destigmatize anything,” Metz (seen in 2019) said. Getty Images for Turner“It’s something I feel like, it is so personal, and sure, I think it’s important to like destigmatize anything,” she said.“But I also think it’s people’s personal decision to decide what it is that they want to do for their body.”“I think ultimately, at the end of the day, we all just want to feel good and feel good about ourselves,” she added. Community GuidelinesWelcome to the Page Six Community!Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.Simply put, keep it civil.Your post will/might be rejected if it contains: Spam Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice: Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk So, how can you be a power user? Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across. 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions! Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules. Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Oct 30, 2026
LAX Starbucks Prices Soar 42.9% Above City Rates, Study Reveals New

LAX Starbucks Prices Soar 42.9% Above City Rates, Study Reveals

See more of our coverage in your search results. They’re serving up a bitter shot of sticker shock.A Starbucks stop at Los Angeles International Airport costs 42.9% more than at a city store — the nation’s 10th-steepest airport markup, according to an Upgraded Points study.A basket of popular items at the java retailer jumped from $24.45 outside the airport to $34.95 inside — a $10.50 hit to travelers.A Starbucks stop at Los Angeles International Airport costs 42.9% more than at a city store Facebook/@doug.greenwaldA basket of popular items at the java retailer jumped from $24.45 outside the airport to $34.95 inside — a $10.50 hit to travelers. Starbucks Coffee CompanyThe spotlight on gateside gouging comes as LA raises minimum pay for covered airport workers — with a city-approved baseline of $25 an hour, before healthcare costs — soaring to $30 by 2029.Southern Californians are already being pushed to the pricing limit when flying — appetite-killing asks at eateries inside Hollywood Burbank Airport’s gleaming new terminal hit the headlines earlier this week, with officials rushing to acknowledge that they were addressing the issue.Meanwhile, at LAX, the Starbucks order studied included a grande brewed coffee, grande caffé latte, bacon, Gouda and egg sandwich, Strawberry Açaí Refresher and birthday cake pop.The average premium was 26.5% — far below the nearly 50% grub gouge endured by LAX flyers. Getty ImagesResearchers checked pretax app prices in July at one Starbucks in each of 53 airports — against one store in the corresponding city.The average premium was 26.5% — far below the nearly 50% grub gouge endured by LAX flyers.Still, caffeine-craving Angelenos could fare worse, at an airport many frequent — Harry Reid International in Las Vegas tied with Charlotte Douglas for the biggest markup nationwide, at 56.4%.A California airport coffee run doesn’t always carry an LAX-sized sting — San Francisco International’s five-item basket cost $27.90, a comparatively modest 13.7% premium.Closer to home, Burbank passengers have been choking on prices at the airport’s $1.3 billion replacement terminal, which opened October 13.As The California Post reported Wednesday, one traveler flagged a $25 bean-and-cheese burrito at Poquito Mas — compared with $11.95 at another Burbank location.Another claimed they’d paid nearly $50 for three tacos and a bottled water.“Plan on taking out a loan,” that traveler griped on Reddit.“I paid $35 for the breakfast burrito and coffee,” another wrote.The airport’s published concession rules generally limit food and beverage prices to 15% above an estimated street-price benchmark.But the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority told The California Post that concessions manager MSC Burbank LLC missed its deadline to submit the data needed to establish those benchmarks. Officials said they were working with the company to secure compliance.Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters California Post News: Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, YouTube, WhatsApp, LinkedInCalifornia Post Sports Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, XCalifornia Post Opinion California Post Newsletters: Sign up here!California Post App: Download here!Home delivery: Sign up here!Page Six Hollywood: Sign up here!

Oct 30, 2026
Kemal Akkaya ve Enver Çevik'in Mal Varlıklarına Yeniden Tedbir Kararı New

Kemal Akkaya ve Enver Çevik'in Mal Varlıklarına Yeniden Tedbir Kararı

İstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı'nın yürüttüğü fon soruşturmasında iki isim hakkında yeni bir karar alındı.Gazeteci Bahadır Özgür'ün aktardığına göre, Bulls Yatırım Menkul Değerler Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Kemal Akkaya ve Lydia Holding Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı Enver Çevik'in mal varlıkları ile finansal işlemlerine tedbir uygulanmasına karar verildi.DAHA ÖNCE TEDBİRLER KALDIRILMIŞTIİstanbul Cumhuriyet Başsavcılığı tarafından yürütülen fon soruşturması kapsamında daha önce 29 kişi hakkında uygulanan bazı tedbirler kaldırılmıştı.Başsavcılığın 9 Ekim 2026 tarihli yazısıyla, aralarında Kemal Akkaya ve Enver Çevik'in de bulunduğu kişilerin mal varlığı işlemlerine yönelik belirli kısıtlamaların sona erdirilmesine karar verilmişti. Öte yandan Enver Çevik'in, Tasarruf Mevduatı Sigorta Fonu'na (TMSF) 500 milyon lirayı gönüllü olarak iade ettiği de ileri sürülmüştü. www.sozcu.com.tr internet sitesinde yayınlanan yazı, haber ve fotoğrafların her türlü telif hakkı Mega Ajans ve Rek. Tic. A.Ş'ye aittir. İzin alınmadan, kaynak gösterilerek dahi iktibas edilemez.

Oct 30, 2026
Gazmend Hoxha Resigns as Police Director Amidst Criticism Over Arlinda Zekaj's Murder New

Gazmend Hoxha Resigns as Police Director Amidst Criticism Over Arlinda Zekaj's Murder

Gazmend Hoxha dha të premten dorëheqje nga pozita e drejtorit të Policisë, pas vrasjes së Arlinda Zekajt nga vëllai i ish-bashkëshortit të saj.Derisa ministrat Xhelal Sveçla dhe Donika Gërvalla nuk e panë të arsyeshme dorëheqjen e tyre, Hoxha nkërkoi sot të lirohet nga detyra.Ndërkohë, në një postim në rrjetin social Facebook, bashkëshortja e tij ka thënë se “po ta linin, ai do të punonte me përgjegjësi dhe profesionalizëm sa herë të ishte nevoja”. “Shoku im i jetës,përgjegjësia nuk është gjithmonë të largohesh kur ndodh një tragjedi.Përgjegjësia më e madhe është të qëndrosh, të përballesh me të vërtetën dhe të rindërtosh besimin.Ti je prej atyre që po të të linin, me përgjegjësi dhe profesionalizëm do të përballeshe, sa herë që paraqitet nevoja.Gjithmonë ke qëndru e je përball me sfidat e organizatës dhe Atdheut, në luftë dhe pas saj, me maturi dhe vendosmëri”, ka shkruar ajo.Më herët, u publikua edhe letra që Hoxha ia nisi Albin Kurtit. “Asnjë pozitë nuk është mbi shtetin, asnjë funksion nuk është më i rëndësishëm se besimi i qytetarëve dhe askush nuk duhet të jetë mbi parimin e llogaridhënies”.

Oct 30, 2026
Dodik brzo promenio stav: Od kritika Studenata do čestitki pobednicima izbora New

Dodik brzo promenio stav: Od kritika Studenata do čestitki pobednicima izbora

PAVEL BEDNYAKOV / EPA autor: 30. okt. 2026. 13:57 Lider SNSD-a Milorad Dodik, koji je tokom predizborne kampanje u Srbiji otvoreno podržavao Aleksandra Vučića i oštro kritikovao Studentsku listu, sada poručuje da je saradnja sa demokratski izabranim predstavnicima vlasti u Beogradu prioritet Republike Srpske. Njegove izjave dolaze samo nekoliko dana nakon što je Studentska lista pobedila na vanrednim parlamentarnim izborima održanim 25. oktobra, osvojivši oko 140 od ukupno 250 poslaničkih mesta. Oglas Kako prenosi Klix.ba, Dodik je u razgovoru za ATV istakao da vlasti Republike Srpske ne smeju da dovode u pitanje dobre odnose sa Srbijom, bez obzira na to ko se nalazi na njenom čelu.„Mi moramo da vodimo računa, da gradimo najbolje odnose sa Srbijom i mi u vlasti u Republici Srpskoj ne kalkulišemo u tom pogledu. Najbolji odnosi sa vlastima su za nas primarni politički posao“, izjavio je Dodik.Na pitanje o njegovoj otvorenoj podršci Vučiću tokom kampanje, Dodik je podsetio da je svojevremeno podržavao i nekadašnjeg predsednika Srbije Borisa Tadića.„Da li si primetio da sam bio na poslednjem mitingu Borisa Tadića? Nisi primetio. A to je moj posao. Mi iz Republike Srpske moramo tako da radimo. Mi moramo da budemo uz zvanično izabrane ljude u Srbiji“, rekao je Dodik.Dodao je da je sa Vučićem imao odličnu saradnju po brojnim pitanjima, posebno kada je reč o odnosu prema Republici Srpskoj, ali da to ne znači da ne želi dobre odnose sa novim vlastima.„A kako ja da izbegnem dobre odnose? Ja želim da imam dobre odnose sa svima“, poručio je.Od uvreda na račun studenata do čestitke na pobediDodikove najnovije izjave predstavljaju značajan zaokret u odnosu na retoriku koju je koristio neposredno pred izbore.Samo nedelju dana pre glasanja, gostujući na televiziji Prva, pozivao je birače iz Republike Srpske da podrže Vučića, dok je njegove političke protivnike nazivao pokvarenim i plaćenicima.„Politički poraziti tu blokadersku strukturu je jedan od istorijskih događaja u istoriji Srbije, koji će obeležiti budući vek. Evo, probali ste, niste uspeli, neće vas narod, doviđenja, prijatno“, govorio je tada Dodik.Podršku koju su studenti dobijali iz regiona predstavljao je kao rezultat stranog finansiranja, iako za takve tvrdnje nije ponudio dokaze. Posebno je kritikovao podršku koja je dolazila iz Crne Gore, Sarajeva i od kosovskog premijera Aljbina Kurtija.U intervjuu za beogradski Alo, objavljenom 15. oktobra, tvrdio je da Srbija ne bi smela da prepusti vlast ljudima koji, prema njegovim rečima, mrze polovinu sopstvenog naroda. Upozoravao je i da bi Republika Srpska mogla da bude jedna od prvih meta nove vlasti ukoliko studenti pobede.Njegovi sukobi sa studentskim pokretom počeli su znatno ranije. Još u februaru 2025. godine, na skupu u Sremskoj Mitrovici, govorio je o „smradovima“ koje nazivaju drugom ili trećom Srbijom. Iako tada nije direktno pomenuo studente, njegove reči protumačene su kao napad na učesnike studentskih protesta.Međutim, nakon što je postalo jasno da je Vučić izgubio izbore, Dodik je brzo promenio ton.Izbornu noć proveo je u štabu Srpske napredne stranke u Beogradu, gde je dočekao Vučićevo priznanje poraza. Već iste večeri uputio je čestitku Studentskoj listi.„Čestitam Studentskoj listi na pobedi. Građani Srbije i svi politički akteri su još jednom demonstrirali demokratski karakter jednog od najstarijih državotvornih naroda u Evropi“, napisao je Dodik.Uz poruku da je „glas naroda glas Boga“, dodao je i: „Idemo dalje, zajedno“.Sličan scenario viđen i posle Tadićevog porazaPozivanje na Borisa Tadića ima i istorijsku pozadinu. Dodik je 2012. godine učestvovao na predizbornom skupu Demokratske stranke, pružajući podršku tadašnjem predsedniku Srbije.Ipak, nakon što je Tadić izgubio predsedničke izbore od Tomislava Nikolića, Dodik je ubrzo najavio saradnju sa novim predsednikom.Sličan obrazac sada se ponavlja i nakon pobede Studentske liste. Političar koji je do pre nekoliko dana oštro napadao studentski pokret i upozoravao na posledice njegovog dolaska na vlast sada ističe da je njegova obaveza da održava najbolje moguće odnose sa zvanično izabranim predstavnicima Srbije. Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama: Koje je tvoje mišljenje o ovoj temi? Učestvuj u diskusiji ili pročitaj komentare

Oct 30, 2026